@gaelforget isn't commit 04c7cc0 the same as #42 ?

@gaelforget isn't commit 04c7cc0 the same as #42 ?

Yes

@gaelforget isn't commit 04c7cc0 the same as #42 ?

Yes

My mistake was that I started #42 on master then branched to do this one. I probably could rebase or do over but figured I would just wait for #42 to be merged which would eliminate the duplicate and supposedly you guys would squash merge so it does not matter. Would this work?

@gaelforget isn't commit 04c7cc0 the same as #42 ?

Yes

My mistake was that I started #42 on master then branched to do this one. I probably could rebase or do over but figured I would just wait for #42 to be merged which would eliminate the duplicate and supposedly you guys would squash merge so it does not matter. Would this work?

done with merge

As this experiment has been moved to MITgcm/verification (PR MITgcm/MITgcm#883), with a new README.md there: https://github.com/MITgcm/MITgcm/blob/master/verification/atm_gray/README.md
this PR update to README $->$ README.md is becoming outdated.
And as previous atm_gray set-up is changed to atm_gray_ll (in PR #73), an updated README will come with it, and this PR will lose its relevance. Therefore, will close this PR once PR #73 is merge.